Nathaniel’s university soccer fantasy was indeed shattered. He had been planning to stay test for murder.

Nathaniel’s university soccer fantasy was indeed shattered. He had been planning to stay test for murder.

The test

On Feb. 13, 2013, a year-and-a-half after Lauren Astley’s murder, her ex-boyfriend Nathaniel Fujita’s test started.

“there is two people that are different” friend Genevieve Flynn stated. “there is, like, the Nate which was in senior high school with us, who was simply, like, during my homeroom, that would joke around beside me, who had been regarding the track group beside me. There is that Nate. Then there is, like, the Nate whom we have actually only actually noticed in handcuffs plus in a court space.”

Expected exactly just exactly how he seemed in court, buddy Hannah Blahut told Smith, “He mostly kept their face down. As soon as he looked up, he seemed not like most Nate that I would ever understood.”

Prosecutor Lisa McGovern wastes no amount of time in spelling down why Lauren ended up being murdered.

“This defendant is accountable just as charged,” McGovern addressed the court inside her opening declaration.

“Nathaniel Fujita had been harmed by Lauren Astley maybe maybe perhaps not finding its way back to him in which he killed her,” McGovern told “48 Hours”

Defense lawyer William Sullivan, in the opening declaration, admits Nathaniel killed Lauren.

“In many murder situations, the real question is who? Who made it happen? that isn’t this instance,” the told the court. “This case there’s– there is gonna be two concerns, why and exactly how. “

“How exactly does a child . there is no actual proof of him ever laying a little finger about this young woman . how can he make a move similar to this?” Sullivan remarked to Tracy Smith. “we told the jury, ‘you’re gonna notice to check out some extremely troubling facts.'”

“. she passed away due to the blend for the strangulation in addition to incised wounds . to her throat,” health Examiner Henry Nields testified.

Nields stated after Lauren had been strangled with a bungee cable, she then suffered quantity of trivial wounds to her throat before her neck had been cut.

“Why these shallow, superficial wounds? He did that to harm her,” McGovern told “48 Hours”. “Why did he deliver the gaping, deep injury? He did that to destroy her.”

The prosecution questioned Genevieve Flynn and Lauren’s other buddies about 2011 — the month between high school graduation and Lauren’s murder june.

“I saw Lauren select her hands up and push them down her part as if she had been saying, simply avoid me personally,” Hannah testified.

Hannah Blahut testified about this graduation celebration where Nathaniel punched a pole keeping within the ongoing celebration tent.

“Nate got mad that Lauren was not speaking with him,” close friend Chloe Jacques told “48 Hours”. “He had been aggressive because he had been extremely drunk.”

McGovern thinks Nathaniel’s display of rage ended up being a prelude that is ominous killing Lauren.

“this will be free ghana chat room a violence murder that is domestic. This is perpetrated because of the relationship, that has been a boyfriend-girlfriend relationship,” McGovern told “48 Hours.”

“The prosecution is painting this as a domestic violence that is violence-dating,” Smith noted to Sullivan. “Proper,” he responded.

However the protection disagrees.

“Nathaniel . did not stalk her. Did not drive by her home. Was not calling her. Was not texting her. And none of this ended up being present,” Sullivan told Smith.

The protection desires the jury to pay attention to Nathaniel’s behavior after graduation prior to Lauren’s murder:

Bill Sullivan: throughout that right time those three months, be fair to state you did not start to see the defendant after all.

R.J. Bolivar: I do not think so.

“their buddies was in fact saying they don’t desire to spend time because he had been acting differently,” Chloe told “48 Hours” with him anymore.

Bill Sullivan: he is perhaps maybe maybe not spending time with you dudes anymore, right?

Connor Murphy: Appropriate.

Friends Connor and R.J. testify Nathaniel had dropped from their social group.

Bill Sullivan: can it be reasonable to express that folks had been commenting that Nathaniel was not around?

R.J. Bolivar: some social everyone was, yeah.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *